Google’s Pixel 6 And Pixel 6 Pro Are Better And More Intelligent.

Pixel (2).png

Google’s Pixel 6 And Pixel 6 Pro Are Larger, Better, And More Intelligent Than Their Predecessors.




Google’s new Pixel phones are the best smartphones the company has ever produced. It’s unusual for a new smartphone to feel completely fresh.

According to the common refrain, smartphones are all a “mature” technology, and today’s new phone is only marginally different from the one that came before.

While there’s some truth to this (Apple has produced fifteen different generations of iPhones! ), the newness you gain from shelling out hundreds of dollars every couple of years to upgrade rarely affects how you go about your daily business.

Although they don’t fold in half or have particularly distinctive designs, Google’s new Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro are a little more innovative than the average phone.

The new smartphones come with improved cameras, improved materials, improved hardware, improved software, and new ideas on what a smartphone should be capable of doing for you.

However, much of this is new for Google and is not necessarily distinguishable from what you could get from a slew of other smartphone manufacturers at the moment.

A new beginning for Google’s smartphone ambitions, the $599 Pixel 6 and $899 Pixel 6 Pro mark the era of a new chapter for the company, which has slogged through five generations of Pixel phones without making even a dent in the smartphone market.

As a result, the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro are not perfectly refined devices, nor do they perform as well as you might expect when it comes to everything Google claims they can do.

Although they lack some features, they remain among the best smartphones available and perhaps the best Android smartphones to buy right now.

The design of the new Pixel phones represents a departure for Google, and it is consistent with the conventions followed by other popular Android phone manufacturers over the past few years.

Instead of funky textured finishes with bright pops of color, they are the standard glass and metal sandwich slabs with aluminium frames and slippery backs that you see everywhere.

There’s less whimsy and character to their details than previous Pixel phones, which I find disappointing.

They aren’t quite as well-polished as the best models from Apple and Samsung at this point, either — it’s easy to find a rough edge or two along the edges of the seams.

Both phones have a front that is difficult to distinguish from many other large Android phones on the market; to my eye, they are most similar to a Samsung Galaxy Note 10 or Note 20.

In addition, while the back has a distinct bar toward the top that houses the cameras, the overall design reminds me of a TCL phone.

Aside from black, red, and green, the Pixel 6 is only available in three two-tone color options: black, white, and gold. The Pixel 6 Pro is only found or available in three more traditional color options: black, white, and gold.

It is worth noting that while the regular 6’s aluminium sides are chunky and matte black, the 6 Pro’s aluminium sides are thinner and polished to a high shine.

The 6 is unquestionably the more entertaining of the two, whereas the 6 Pro falls short or below other phones in its price range in terms of design, fit and finish, and overall quality of construction.


The camera bar that runs the length of the back of each phone is the most prominent design element. It’s large and prominent, and it doesn’t quite blend in with the rest of the phone’s design.

On the plus side is, it does not cause the phone to rock when placed on a table or desk, as is the case with other phones’ camera bumps.

In reality, most of these design critiques are purely academic because you might put a case on either phone and cover up any rough edges or dull colors that you don’t like.

That’s also a fantastic idea, given the fact that both phones are capital-L large, and their smooth glass backs are extremely slippery to the touch.

One of our sample units fell hard enough to crack the Gorilla Glass Victus glass panel that covered its screen, and I’ve seen them slide off wireless chargers, sofa arms, tables, and my lap, to name a few places.

As an aside, I’ve been using Google’s translucent recycled plastic cases with the Pixel 6, and they’re terrible — I recommend looking into third-party options instead.)

In all honesty, my primary issue with the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro designs is that they are too large for my tastes. One-handed use is difficult, and they are difficult to store in many of my pants pockets because they are so lightweight.

Pixel (1).png

They are also easy to lose. Before this sixth generation, Google offered both small and large versions of its phones; now, it only offers large or larger models, with the size difference between the two is negligible (see image below).

Although these phones are the same size as the iPhone Pro Max, this excludes us who don’t care for huge slabs of glass and metal.

On the plus side, both phones have large, bright displays that are easy to read. The Pixel 6’s screen is a 6.4-inch OLED panel with a 1080p wide resolution, while the Pixel 6 Pro’s screen is a 6.7-inch OLED panel with a 1440p wide resolution, making it the larger of the two devices.

The screen on the Pixel 6 is completely flat, whereas the screen on the Pixel 6 Pro comes with curved sides that taper into the frame.

However, while I prefer the flat screen of my iPhone 6, the curves of the 6 Pro didn’t cause any errant touch issues during my testing, which can make a curved screen difficult to use in some situations.

Both are sharp, vibrant, and colorful, with the 6 Pro having a slight edge in terms of brightness when used outside in direct sunlight.

In addition, none of the major issues that plagued older Pixel phones, such as strange reproduction or flickering at low brightness levels, have been resolved.

You’ll notice some flaws if you look closely: there’s a slight color shift when viewing the phone from oblique angles, and when using a light background, there’s a noticeable shadow under the curved sides of the 6 Pro.

These are issues that we haven’t seen on the best iPhones or Samsung phones up to this point.

When it comes to the displays on these phones, they are the one area where the lower price tag is most noticeable. They’re good, but they’re not quite up to the standards set by other major competitors.

We found the displays to be satisfactory, but not the best we’ve seen so far.

They also carry or have fast refresh rates — 90Hz on the Pixel 6 and up to 120Hz on the Pixel 6 Pro — making scrolling and interactions with the device extremely fluid.

Fast refresh screens have become standard on high-end smartphones, and it’s encouraging to see Google follow suit in this regard.

There was no discernible difference between the 90Hz and 120Hz unless I looked at the phones side by side; both phones are very smooth when in use.

The fingerprint scanner, located beneath the screen, is less smooth. However, while it is conveniently located near the bottom of the screen (about a quarter-way up), it is significantly slower than other fingerprint scanners, such as those found on the back of older Pixel phones.

Because it is optical, the screen illuminates when you scan it with your finger, which can be extremely distracting in dark environments.

In addition, the scanner misread my finger from time to time, necessitating multiple attempts to unlock the smartphone.

This error is exacerbated because the Pixel 6 and 6 Pro do not have any form of facial recognition unlocking technology — the fingerprint scanner is the only biometric authentication option available, and it is not particularly accurate.

One of the unique aspects of the Pixel 6 pair is the processor inside them, which is Google’s new Tensor chip, one of the most powerful processors available.

In a move that follows Apple’s footsteps, Google has developed its first custom processor, which will replace existing off-the-shelf processors from Qualcomm and MediaTek.

Additionally, the Tensor processor has a great deal of AI-based customization, which allows it to improve features such as the camera, speech recognition, and gaming in addition to powering the phone.

In terms of performance, Google claims that the new processor is on par with the Qualcomm Snapdragon 888, which I have found to be true in my testing.

Application launches quickly, switching between them is seamless, and the interface is free of stutters and hangups.

However, Twitter was the only app that experienced stuttering on both phones, and that was an outlier. Even though the Tensor chip will not compete with Apple’s latest processors in terms of benchmarking, it is light years ahead of the processor that was in the Pixel 5 last year and on par with other premium Android phones.

Google’s Pixel 6 comes with 8GB of RAM, while the Pixel 6 Pro has 12GB of RAM. In practice, the Pixel 6’s lower amount of RAM did not cause any problems, as streaming apps did not close aggressively in the background, as they did on previous Pixel phones.

The battery life of the two phones was also comparable, with no discernible difference between the two.

Both devices are easily capable of getting through a full day of use with plenty of juice left in the tank — on most nights, I went to bed with 35-40 per cent of the battery remaining, despite heavy use of the camera and the use of the always-on display feature on the camera.

Light users will most likely extend this to two days with little effort. One of the primary reasons for this endurance is that the batteries are large — large phones require large batteries, resulting in long battery life.

However, neither model includes a charger, even though both models support wireless charging and fast wired charging.

Separately, Google sells a $25 30-watt brick, and the company plans to release a $79 fast wireless charger in the foreseen future, but I haven’t had a chance to test either of those products yet.

Both phones charge relatively slowly, even if you use a powerful enough charger to accomplish this task.

Google aggressively slows down charging once it reaches 80 per cent in order to prolong the life of the battery cells, and because these batteries are so large, it can take a long time to charge them fully.

Fortunately, because of the long battery life, you will most likely only need to charge your phone when you are sleeping.


Another area in which the Pixels perform exceptionally well is in the area of haptic feedback.

The Google smartphone Pixel 6 and 6 Pro have subtle, clicky responses that provide just the right amount of feedback, which is a welcome change from the buzzy haptics I’m used to with other smartphones.


It does typing on the keyboard and interacting with the user interface (UI) a pleasurable experience.

For streaming music or video as well as making speakerphone or video calls, both the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro are equipped with proper, dual stereo speakers that produce a sufficient amount of volume and sound clarity.

Goodbye, Google’s vibrating screen pseudo-speaker featured in the Pixel 5 smartphone last year.

Despite the fact that Google is touting 5G connectivity for both the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro, the specifics aren’t quite as straightforward.

The Pixel 6 is only capable of sub-6 5G on the unlocked and T-Mobile models, whereas the Verizon and AT&T models platforms are more expensive and can support the faster but more limited millimeter wave (mmWave) 5G.

None of this confusion with the Pixel 6 Pro will support sub-6 and mmWave 5G networks regardless of how you purchase it.

In comparison to the unlocked, T-Mobile, and Verizon models, AT&T’s additional cost for its model only grants you access to the privilege of being an AT&T customer and nothing more.

Google Fi, which uses T-5G Mobile’s network, allowed me to use unlocked versions of the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro for testing.

Its performance was comparable to that of other high-end smartphones I’ve used on T-Mobile, and I was able to achieve download speeds of 300 to 400Mbps in certain parts of New York City, which is significantly faster than the download speeds I get on LTE in the same areas.

The Google smartphone Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro’s camera systems are also completely new, featuring new sensors, new lenses, and new capabilities that were not present in previous models.

In 2018, Google finally upgraded the camera hardware in the Pixel line for the first time since 2017, and this time, they went all out — quite literally.

The new main camera sensor is significantly larger than the one used in the Pixel 5 and earlier models. The Pixel 6 Pro is the first device in the line to include ultrawide, wide, and telephoto cameras in the same package.

Both phones have the same primary wide-angle and ultrawide-angle cameras. There is a 50-megapixel sensor in the main camera, which is hard-coded to produce 12.5-megapixel images behind an optically stabilized f/1.85 lens.

And there is also a secondary camera with an 8-megapixel sensor. That means you won’t be able to capture images with the full 50-megapixel resolution.

The images you do capture won’t be noticeably sharper or more detailed than images captured by other 12-megapixel cameras, such as the Pixel 5’s.

When using the PIXEL 6 PRO, the TELEPHOTO CAMERA is the most enjoyable.

Despite this, the images are excellent in both normal and low light conditions, and they are on par with the best from Apple.

Although there isn’t a clear winner here, some images from the Pixel 6 look better than others from the iPhone 13 Pro, and which you prefer comes down to your personal preferences, which is something we’ve been saying about smartphone cameras for a few years now.

The images taken with the Pixel 6 have the classic Pixel look: high contrast, slight overexposure, extreme sharpness, and a cooler white balance, among other characteristics.

Adjusting the white balance is simple enough to do in the camera app using the on-screen sliders, but fine-tuning the sharpness requires a little more effort in post-processing software.

Google’s artificial portrait mode, which aggressively blurs the background to the point where it almost appears as if the subject is a cardboard cutout placed in a diorama, has remained largely unchanged since its introduction.

One area in which I would like Google to improve is the amount of time it takes for its much-lauded night mode to capture a shot.

Even though the night mode can capture incredible amounts of detail in dark environments, it does so at the expense of a significant amount of time.

As a result, both subjects and those taking the photos frequently become impatient, and things become blurry. The iPhone’s night mode was frequently half as fast as the Pixel’s when capturing night scenes.

Overall, however, the improvements in image quality from the main camera are not as significant as you might expect given the new, significantly improved hardware available.

Even in good lighting, it’s sometimes difficult to tell the difference between it and the images you could get with older Pixel phones.

The Google Pixel 6’s ultrawide camera is its weakest link — images are soft, the field of view isn’t as wide as others, and there’s a noticeable difference in color and processing between the ultrawide and the main camera.

It also lacks the macro focusing capabilities found on the ultrawide camera found on the iPhone 13 Pro, among other things.

The telephoto camera fitted on the Pixel 6 Pro, on the other hand, is exceptional in its field of view. It’s the first telephoto lens on a phone that I’ve enjoyed using, and it might be enough to convince me to upgrade to the 6 Pro rather than the regular 6 in the future.

The 4x reach is clearly longer than the 3x telephoto zoom on the iPhone 13 Pro. Still, it is significantly more usable in everyday situations than the 10x zoom on Samsung’s Galaxy S21 Ultra.

Besides that, the telephoto lens produces sharp, detailed images with excellent subject separation, which reduces the use of software-based portrait modes.

In terms of shooting, it’s a lot of fun. It also represents a significant advancement in what you can do with a smartphone.

Imagery has a classic pixel look: high contrast, a little overexposure, and lots of detail. Imagery is available for purchase here.

Google claims to have improved the video recording capabilities of the Pixel 6, but the device is still lagging behind the iPhone, which continues to be the industry standard.

Shooting 4K 60fps for an extended period without overheating is possible. Still, image stabilization has noticeable artefacts and wonkiness, and the video image processing is strangely different from how the Pixel processes still images.

Highly saturated colors, such as reds and oranges, are amplified to the extreme in video, almost to the point where they look like Samsung processed them years ago.

In terms of cameras, the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro have different configurations on the front — the Pixel 6 has an 8MP camera with an 84-degree field of view, while the Pixel 6 Pro has an 11MP camera with a 94-degree field of view.

Not only would you be able to fit more people into the frame of the 6 Pro, but the image quality will also be noticeably better.

The Pixel’s Tensor chip allows for a couple of unique software tricks in the camera and photos app, which are made possible by the chip.

The new Magic Eraser tool allows you to quickly and easily remove unwanted people or objects from a captured image or photo with a single tap, or you could select specific items to remove with a single tap.

However, it is hit or miss, and it will not be able to take the place of any skilled Photoshop editors in the near future — at least not anytime soon.

There are lots of third-party apps that can be used to accomplish similar tasks, so purchasing a Pixel isn’t absolutely necessary.

However, the new motion capture modes, which allow you to mimic a panning motion shot or a long exposure with a single tap of the shutter button, are what I find most intriguing.

The ability to freeze a moving object (such as a car) in front of a blurred background and capture traffic light streaks without using a tripod are all possibilities.

With a traditional camera, creating these kinds of images takes years of practice and a slew of expensive equipment, but the Pixel 6 makes it as simple as taking a selfie with your phone.

Aside from that, Google has made a big deal about changes it made to its image processing algorithm this year to make it more capable of dealing with darker skin tones, which it has dubbed “Real Tone.

“Bias in image processing has been a problem for the photo industry for decades, dating all the way back to the invention of film, so it’s encouraging to see Google taking steps to address it.

According to the company, it is impossible to turn on or off the Real Tone processing on the Pixel because it is baked into the device’s image processing pipeline.

Both Nicole Nguyen at the Wall Street Journal and Julian Chokkattu at Wired were able to test the camera with a variety of darker skin tones and came to some interesting conclusions;

I would encourage you to read their respective articles for more information. When you look at all of the photos, it’s clear that the Pixel is still doing Pixel things: high contrast, with a small amount of overexposure to compensate for this, and extremely sharp details.

Even if you have darker skin, that look may appeal to some people, but it may not appeal to everyone.

It’s only natural that the Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro would run the most recent version of Google’s Android operating system, the completely redesigned Android 12.

We’ve already published a comprehensive review of Android 12; all I’ll say is that it appears to have been reserved for the software in place of the fun and whimsy that was not part and missing from the hardware design of the new Pixels.

It’s bright and easy to read, and numerous customization options are available.

Also unsurprising, several software features are exclusive to the Pixel, including things made better by Google’s new Tensor processor.

The Pixel 6 has improved voice dictation transcription, thanks to it can now do everything locally. It could translate foreign languages in messages and media faster than previous models.

However, the phone application contains the most impressive software features, in my opinion. With the Pixel 6, you can now get help with automated phone tree systems and find out how much time you might have to wait when you call a business,

in addition to the spam routing features that Google has had for a few years. Moreover, it can place you on hold and notify you when someone picks up the phone.

The automated phone tree feature would listen in on the call and transcribe the options presented, after which you will be presented with large tappable buttons to make your selection.

Please try to listen to every word the system says, and then missing something critical and having to wait for it to restart is far more convenient.

However, during testing, it became clear that this still requires improvement: it is unable to recognize languages other than English (for example, when you are instructed to “press two for Spanish”),

and it frequently misses words and context, preventing it from displaying the appropriate buttons on the screen. Nonetheless, it’s an interesting concept, and I hope Google continues to develop and refine it.

Other enhancements include the ability to display boarding passes and other useful information directly on the lock screen, as well as support for specific voice commands to the Assistant that does not require the user to say “Hey Google.

“Having the ability to mumble “snooze” when an alarm goes off and have the phone respond is extremely convenient.

One of the popular or most frequently asked questions in the wake of the Pixel 6 announcement has been: Did Google do it? Is it capable of producing a competent, flagship-level smartphone free of show-stopping bugs and other major snares?

The new Google smartphone Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro are outstanding smartphones, confirmed by the overwhelming majority of reviewers.

Despite the fact that they are not the best in every category, they perform admirably as a group, have excellent screens, excellent cameras, and consistently long battery life.

The only real drawback here is the size — if you don’t like large phones, these are perhaps not the best choice of options for your needs.

Considering its price of $600, the Pixel 6 is an incredible phone.

The fact that they contain so much value only adds to their appeal. The Pixel 6, in particular, is an incredible amount of phone for the money — it’s difficult to think of anything on the market that can compete with it at that price.

In the Pixel market, Google provides a better experience than virtually every other Android phone manufacturer, and it is frequently doing so at a lower price.

It’s even undercutting OnePlus, which has built its entire brand around the concept of selling high-end smartphones at low prices.

Does this imply that many people will purchase the Pixel 6 or Pixel 6 Pro, even though Google has long struggled to gain any market share?

To be honest, I couldn’t care less because those who do purchase it will receive a fantastic phone at an even better price. It’s difficult to come up with an argument against that.




We hope you found this article interesting? And what do you think about ‘Google’s Pixel 6 and Pixel 6 Pro Are Better And More Intelligent?’


Please feel free to share your thoughts with us in the box below.


Check the facts


With accuracy and impartiality, we endeavour to deliver the most up-to-date essential information for tech enthusiasts.


Please contact us if you would like to contribute to this article or advertise with us.


And let us know if you notice something that isn’t quite right.




Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here